03 July 2011

Asset bubbles and the Federal Reserve
On 1 June 2011, Fed Vice Chair Janet L. Yellen delivered a speech on Assessing Potential Financial Imbalances in an Era of Accommodative Monetary Policy at a Bank of Japan conference in Tokyo.

The speech does not mention the word 'bubble' even once but she was obviously referring to bubbles when she said:

"The severe economic consequences of the recent financial crisis have underscored the need for central banks to vigilantly monitor the financial system for emerging risks to financial stability. Indeed, such vigilance may be particularly important when monetary policy remains highly accommodative for an extended period. As many observers have argued, an environment of low and stable interest rates may encourage investor behavior that could potentially lead to the emergence of financial imbalances that could threaten financial stability."

Elsewhere she said:

"A sustained period of very low and stable yields may incent a phenomenon commonly referred to as 'reaching for yield,' in which investors seek higher returns by purchasing assets with greater duration or increased credit risk."

This is quite a change from, say, Ben Bernanke's statement on Asset-price "bubbles" and monetary policy on 15 October 2002:

"First, the Fed cannot reliably identify bubbles in asset prices. Second, even if it could identify bubbles, monetary policy is far too blunt a tool for effective use against them."

Or from Alan Greenspan's statement on 17 June 1999:

"But bubbles generally are perceptible only after the fact. To spot a bubble in advance requires a judgement that hundreds of thousands of informed investors have it all wrong. Betting against markets is usually precarious at best."

The rest of Yellen's speech is devoted to the parameters the Fed is keeping track of to ensure that there are no financial imbalances and concludes that though there is the stray worrying sign, overall there are no significant imbalances.

From the graph of Corrected Money Supply (Mc) that I have constructed I would seriously doubt this.

The steep rise in Mc in recent months and the fact that banks aren't doing much lending to firms suggest that their profits are coming from trading and taking on risk assets.

I am really curious to know why the large banks are cutting back on staff just after they've made such huge profits. Is it a sign that they are in trouble?


Category: Economics


Philip George
Debunker of Keynesian, monetarist and Austrian economics

Buy my new ebook
Contact Me
Categories
Books
Communism
Economics
Google
Income-Tax
Internet
Kerala
Mathematics
Miscellaneous
Mobile-Sites
Science
Search-Engines
Archives
December 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
April 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
February 2015
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
May 2014
April 2014
December 2013
October 2013
July 2013
May 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
August 2010
October 2009
May 2009
June 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007